Tuesday, 14 April 2015

Artist's of the Months: March and April

The timed tests are approaching! The department has been buzzing with excitement and nerves since the arrival back from the Easter Holidays. I think we are all starting to feel the pressure! However, we have seen some excellent pieces and feel these individuals deserve some praise for their ongoing hard work. A massive well done to you all and keep up the good work!

Eva Priestley – A2 Graphic Communication



Alex Barker – A2 Fine Art
Image coming soon!



Sohail Khalil – AS Graphic Communication




Michaela Richardson – AS Fine Art




Good luck in your timed examination next week AS students!




Monday, 23 March 2015

Learner Voice 2015


Learner Voice – Art and Design 2015 
 
Every year in the Art and Design department we ask our students to give us feedback on their experiences.  We usually do this on the day they hand in their coursework as everyone has had chance to work and progress within the department for a good amount of time and hopefully will give us relevant and constructive feedback.

This year the coursework hand it took place on 29th and 30th January and we asked Fine Art, Graphics and photography students to ‘Tell us what they love…’ and ‘Tell us what you wish for…’ and here are the results:

 

Tell us what you love about Fine Art, Graphic Communication and photography at Thomas Rotherham College:

We had an 81% (a 1% increase from last year) response rate across all endorsements and levels, individually 82% of Art students, 85% of Graphics students and 73% of Photography students told us about the things they love about our department.  All endorsements identified common ‘loves’ and here is a breakdown:

The Art Department Staff, Support available and a Positive Working Atmosphere:

 
The hands down most popular thing about our department was the staff and support given.  44% of Fine Art, 45% of Photography and 52% of Graphics students stated the ‘Positive Teacher Support’ was the best thing about our department.  9.6% (Art), 8.5% (Graphics and 18% (photography) valued the positive working atmosphere. In Fine Art students said ‘Help is always available. Staff in Art are always wanting the best from students’ and ‘positive constructive feedback’ is ‘frequent, so we know what to do’.  Graphics students commented on the ‘The amount of support and extra help/time given by staff’ and there were ‘clear instructions for work’ given.’   Similarly in Photography students said they ‘love one to ones to get feedback, reassurance and suggestions’.  Staff were described as ‘Dedicated and helpful’, ‘supportive’ and ‘friendly’, and even ‘Love the teachers!’ Luckily, we love our students too and are grateful that you recognise our hard work, as we very much appreciate yours.

Students across all endorsements valued getting ‘regular feedback’, ‘constructive feedback’ and being ‘pushed’.   We are obviously very pleased with this feedback as not only do we like to know we are helping, but this year we have overhauled the way in which we conduct one to ones as the increase in student numbers and group sizes has meant we have had to change our way of working.  On the whole these changes seem to be receiving good feedback.

Materials, Techniques, Creative Freedom and the Open Door policy
 

13.5% of Fine art and 8.5% of Graphics students said the materials and techniques available were the best thing about our department.  7.7% (Fine Art), 5.7% (Graphics) and 13.6% (Photography) valued the ever popular open door policy.  Students commented on the ‘Good materials and facilities’ and the ‘freedom to experiment and the huge variety of materials and media’ used.   All endorsements appreciated being able to ‘come in and work at any time’. Creative freedom again this year is highly valued – ‘Freedom to choose different ideas’ and ‘I like how you can express and experiment with your own work’. We are very proud to have such creative students and love to see the wide variety of exciting, interesting and sometimes downright spectacular things you come up with.

11% of Graphics students in particular loved the ‘good printmaking facilities’ the most! ‘Lino printing is the best!’

Students across all endorsements mentioned the sketchbooks – ‘I really enjoy working in sketchbooks’

Fine Art students especially loved ‘the space to work in the studio’– ‘Enough space to explore techniques and ideas’ and ‘Space J ‘.  This is much improved from last year as the rooms upstairs have been opened up to create one large studio which not only means there is more space to work, but also contributes to the positive working atmosphere.  We have AS and A2 classes running simultaneously in the same room, as well as students working independently outside lessons all in one large room.  This new physical space seems to be allowing students to create a positive working atmosphere by filling the room constantly with a buzz of creative activity and discussion.  Interestingly this was not listed as a strength by any of the Graphics or Photography students who work downstairs.  Hopefully this will be resolved by next year, watch this space…..literally……..

14% of Graphics and 13.6% of photography students stated the ‘digital opportunities’ and ‘computers available’ were something they loved.  They also commented on ‘how there is a mixture of practical and digital aspects’.  We are extremely pleased with this as last year ‘faster computers’ was raised as a ‘wish’ in the learner voice activity,  this resulted in new and more machines being installed in R018.

Tell us what you wish for in Fine Art, Graphic Communication and Photography at Thomas Rotherham College

We had an 81% response rate across all endorsements and levels, individually 82% of Art students, 85% of Graphics students and 73% of Photography students told us what they wish for in the department .  All endorsements identified common ‘wishes’ and here is the breakdown:

Storage space and Working Space:
 

Despite The space upstairs featuring heavily in the ‘loves’ for Fine Art, the storage space across the whole department and working space downstairs was commented on across all endorsements.  17% (Art) 31% (Graphics) and 36% (Photography) of students stated space and many specified drawers in particular as an issue.  Graphics asked for ‘MORE DRAWERS!!!!’ and said there ‘was not enough space to work’.  Photography and Fine Art asked for ‘bigger/deeper drawers to hold more 3D objects’.  All said we needed ‘more drying space for prints’.

Our Response:

Working Space downstairs: The working space downstairs is going to be rearranged and there are some top secret plans afoot to improve the rooms in general, you will have to just wait and see! But this is definitely being looked at. 

Drawers – this year we have had much increased student numbers and therefore storage space is at a premium.  One 8 drawer plan chest cost (at the cheapest!) £414, we do need to consider how we can give students individual storage space further and will get back to you on this.

Drying racks for prints: This is something we always struggle with as if we provide more drying racks, this takes up working space which then will cause problems.  The biggest problem we find is prints being left on the drying racks uncollected.  Students need to take responsibility for collecting their work to ensure the work on there is actually ‘drying’!  We will create some ‘work from drying rack’ areas and signs reminding students to collect their work.

Printing Work and Reprographics
 

This is an ongoing issue and comes up every year, we are constantly developing how we deal with this issue.  11.5% (Art, 28.5% (Graphics and 31.8%(photography) of students mentioned this.  The wishes came in two main forms this year:

1.    ‘A printer in the computer room’

Our Response: Every year this is requested and every year the response is the same, we used to have a printer in the graphics room, however the cost and logistics of this was unworkable.  The teacher would spend most of lesson time sorting out print outs and collecting money, wasting valuable teaching time.  Also the quality of print outs was far inferior to that available at reprographics.  We do have a special deal (£5 photocopying card with 70 credits) with reprographics who have far more facilities than we could ever offer in the department e.g. printing up to A1, laminating, different papers, A3 scanning etc so we feel it would be better to continue with our current way of working.

2.     ‘easier access to reprographics’, ‘bigger reprographics department’

Our Response: Obviously this year our student numbers have almost trebled, which has meant an increased pressure on reprographics. Jane and Janet have already put in place 2 things to make using reprographics easier.

 

Progress made:

A Reprographics Collection Area – This is located next to the Art office downstairs, Jane and Janet will bring your print outs through when they are ready an put them in the racking, this will save you walking all the way round to reprographics.  Unfortunately you cannot use the door between repro and the Art department for health and safety reasons.

Printer credits transfer – To help with the cost of printing, reprographics can now transfer credits allocated to you for use in the LRC to a reprographics art card.  This can only be done in £5 increments but will help with the cost of printing.

Materials: Guillotines and Paper Towels
 

This was quite a big wish from students across all endorsements, however there were some subject specific responses too.  25% (Art) 11% (Graphics) and 31.8%(Photography) of students mentioned this.  All areas wanted ‘more guillotines’ despite us buying 4 more smaller guillotines earlier in the year. 

Our Response: We will cost up buying more and also creating specific ‘cutting areas’ in the rooms.

All endorsements mentioned ‘more basic supplies available in rooms e.g. gluesticks, scissors, tape, brushes etc’. 

Our Response: We do not provide gluesticks, tape or brushes to students as we have done in the past and have found students do not look after them and this simply costs too much money to maintain.  If students are responsible for their own materials they tend to look after them more.  For example, there are ‘Basic Materials’ trays in every room which should contain rulers, scissors, rubbers, sharpeners and any spare pencils/brushes etc we find laying about.  However, materials are not returned, lost and not looked after.  We will look at rearranging this, putting the basic materials in the ‘cutting areas’ with a signing sheet to say when they were last checked.

Every year lowering the cost of materials raised as a wish - ‘Cheaper Art Materials/more free supplies’ (Art), ‘Prices of things’ (Photography) ‘too expensive – sketchbooks’ (graphics). However this year this was mentioned significantly less this year, even with the increased student numbers.

Our Response: We only sell materials at the price it costs us to buy and as we order from an educational supplier this is much cheaper than you would pay in the shops.  We charge for basics such as paper, brushes and glue sticks as in the past when we haven’t these things in particular have been wasted on a big enough scale to affect our budget for the year.  We supply printing materials and basic acrylic paints, however we need to charge for things such as plaster, intaglio plates and lino.  These are expensive to buy for whole classes and as we have a very small departmental budget, unfortunately we would not be able to offer these materials and techniques if we didn’t charge for them.  We think it is important, and also students think it is important, to have access to a wide range of materials and techniques.  However we will discuss how we can make the costs less prohibitive and more clear at the start of the course.

The introduction of the student levy this year seems to have had a positive impact on how students feel about paying for materials.  Being able to pay upfront an amount, then deduct the price of any materials needed as and when seems to make the cost feel like it has less of an impact.  We will continue to use the levy system.

Sketchbooks have been introduced this year mainly as we have so many students we thought this would make it easier and safer to keep all work together and well presented.  In the past students have made their own larger A2 journals for which they had to buy the paper which in the end, cost roughly the same as a sketch book.

One student has requested a ‘Vending machine full of art stuff’ which I think is an absolute genius idea! However, I am not sure it is possible, but we will investigate!!

Fine Art Specific:


Fine Art in particular mentioned the following: ‘More paper towels, soap dispenser upstairs’, there has been difficulty actually locating an area for a soap dispenser as the sinks are under the window, however we will resolve this issue. 

Our Response: We will implement daily sink checks to check the tidiness of the sinks and the paper towels.

‘Coat pegs’ again were mentioned upstairs, this has been an ongoing issue locating a suitable spot which will be clean, unused and away from any messy materials. 

Our Response: We will liaise with site to locate a suitable space.

19% of Fine Art wanted the printmaking facilities extending; ‘a bigger printing table’ and ‘another press’.  One student also requested the ‘opportunity to do screen printing’

Our Response: We bought the second press two years ago and as our student number rise we hope to be able to purchase another one.  However a small basic model at its cheapest is upwards of £1000.  The printing table has already had a revamp and inking areas have been extended to a second table.  Screen printing is in the graphics scheme of work, however not the fine art, we will look into this for next year.  We are over the moon you enjoy printmaking so much!

Graphics Specific:
 

‘More scanners’ were raised as something students would like more of in the graphics room, also a request for an ‘A3 Scanner’ was put forward. 

Our Response:  Currently there are 5 A4 scanners in R018 and reprographics kindly allow us to use their A3 scanner, however this is not ideal.  More scanners and an A3 scanner will be priced up and considered for next year, watch this space!

Photography Specific:
 

‘MORE MEMORY CARD READERS’ was underlined rather emphatically by one photography student, and reinforced by others. 

Our Response: We will price these up and order more.

Points individual to endorsement:

Both Fine Art and Graphics mentioned the teaching in their wish list; some want ‘longer one to ones’ whereas others said ‘the one to ones take too long so we have less time to do work’. 

Our Response: We have already implemented a new system for the ESA where each student has a scheduled one to one every week so the time spent with each student and regularity that they are seen is evenly distributed (as much as possible).

Fine Art wanted both ‘more direction with my work’ as well as ‘listen to student opinions’ about work.  One student said that although it was understood it was ‘unavoidable’ having split teaching was ‘confusing’ with ‘conflicting orders’.  They also wanted ‘more physical examples’ and ‘more time for evaluation’.

Our Response: It is always a balancing act teaching a creative subject, as some students require lots of support and advice, other students have the confidence to tackle tasks more independently.  Our job is to provide a structured approach for you to work within which will enable you to meet the criteria laid out in the assessment objectives.  In a creative subject this can lead to confusion as you will get different ideas from different teachers, as you would if you asked different members of your class and that is a good thing.  The course requires you to develop your own ideas, by listening to different ideas and opinions you can then develop your own.

We will endeavour to provide more physical examples of work, and have recently started putting up ‘weekly work logs’ which are displayed on the wall in the classrooms as well as on Moodle with examples of what work is required that particular week.  We also photograph work regularly and upload this to pinterest.  Unfortunately the time is tight for the course and we too agree more time for evaluation would be fantastic, however, this is just not possible at the moment.

One Graphics student thought ‘explanation of homework needs to be clearer’.
 
Our Response: Each week the homework is explained in class in each lesson.  There is also a written explanation provided on moodle and most often (especially in the first term) a powerpoint explaining things like ‘what is a working brief’ etc.  There is unfortunately only a finite amount of time in lesson which can be devoted to homework in class, however we totally appreciate that homework tasks can sometimes be complicated and difficult to understand.  Teachers are always available during subject workshop for further explanation or via email.  We have also started displaying ‘weekly work logs’ on the wall and on moodle, hopefully this will help.

And there we have it! Thank you to everyone who took part in our Learner Voice activities, your feedback is invaluable to us to make sure we keep doing the good things and continue developing as a department to give you the best student experience possible.  Keep your eyes open for further updates of actions and changes which have come about as a direct result of your feedback, we will be very busy over the coming months!!

 

 

Monday, 2 March 2015

Artist of the Month: January and February


The coursework hand-in has come and gone (YAY!). We are now well into the ESA module and have seen amazing work so far! However, we would like to state a special well done to these two particular students! Congratulations to the both of you:


Shannon Marriott - A2 Fine Art




Michaela Richardson - AS Fine Art
 


We will be keeping our eyes peeled for the next month so continue with the hard work everyone!
 
 

Friday, 16 January 2015

Forgotten Spaces - Young Creatives 2015


Forgotten Spaces is back! For those of you that do not know what it entails; it is a competition which is run by Sheffield Hallam University in conjunction with the Royal Institute of British Architects. The aim of the competition is for students to design and develop a site within their local area to give  a fresh look, and explore potential solutions for reusing the ‘Forgotten Space’. It gives students the opportunity to gain an insight into the skills needed to regenerate and design spaces. Taking part in this competition is an amazing opportunity for anyone interested in studying architecture or other creative subjects. It gives you an understanding of what it is like to be an architect and the design process, and it is an impressive addition to your UCAS personal statement.

 

In previous years, the students have received amazing prizes as they achieved 1st & 2nd place. The pressure is on but we are sure the students will generate some excellent ideas! The below images are examples of the work that was submitted last year.

Team Trenovation
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Team TRSpaces
 
 
 

 
 
 

 

The teams for the competition have already been decided. This year there are two teams of 3 students in each group, all in their first year of college. Each team member is either studying Fine Art, Graphic Communication and/or Photography. Say hello to the teams:

 

Team TRCreate: Emily Saul, Alice Kendall and Hannah Wilson.

 

Team Blank Canvas: Rebecca Peet, Natalie Goldson and Harry Hardwick.

 

The competition kicked off today as the students arrived at college eager to share ideas with one another. There have been some really exciting and inventive ideas already (whilst munching pringles and donuts!), which we are incredibly pleased about! Now the hard work begins – putting the ideas into action! The deadline for the submission is on the 23rd March and it will come round quicker than we know it!
 
Good luck to both teams and I look forward to seeing the end results - let's enjoy it along the way!
 
 

Thursday, 8 January 2015

Learner Voice - Review of 2014


Learner Voice – What has changed since 2014?

Every year in January the Art and Design department we ask our students to give us feedback on their experiences.  To see the original post featuring all the feedback please see here:

Current students will have their chance to feedback their views this year when they hand in their coursework on 29th and 30th January this year.  Before that happens, here is a review of what progress we have made of the ‘wishes’ that arose last year:
(The original post appears in red and the update appears in black)

Tell us what you wish for in Fine Art and Graphic Communication at Thomas Rotherham College:

We had an 80% response rate across AS and A2 Fine Art and a 77% response rate in Graphics.  Both endorsements identified some common ‘wishes’ but there were also some more subject specific requests.  Here is the breakdown of the common wishes:

Cleaner Rooms:

25% of Art and 34% of Graphics students wished for cleaner rooms and the staff in the Art Department agree! ’For people to clean up after themselves a lot more’, ‘no plaster!’ ‘For people to clean the printing areas after they finish’.  

Our Response: The cleaning staff are employed to sweep the floor and empty the bins and no more, it is our responsibility as users of the studios to keep mess and disruption to a minimum .This poses a unique problem for us as generally in lesson, students clear away and tidy up after themselves.  However when students are working independently outside their lessons, they are much less considerate.  We could solve this problem by closing the studios outside lessons, however 29% of students said they loved our ‘open door’ policy.  Mess is also caused by materials such as plaster and printing, again we could limit the materials we can use but again 23% of learners identified the range of materials available as a strength of the department.

R113 and R112 have now been knocked through into one room, creating an open studio for use by all students.  We have introduced ‘YELLOW’ inking areas where inking plates and blocks for printmaking should take place and have identified ‘CLEAN TABLES’ where students can work on journals and sketchbooks without using ‘wet’ materials. 

We have also now got a larger dedicated ‘PLASTER AREA’ which is separated from the main classroom.

Downstairs we have shelves and an increased amount of drying racks for work.  We also have new paper towel and soap dispensers. 

Due to the increase in student’s numbers and the sheer volume of activity in the rooms (the open door policy seems as popular as ever this year!) this invariably brings an increase in mess.  The tidiness and cleanliness of the rooms depend a lot on the individual responsibility of everyone using the rooms as we do not have a ‘cleaner’.  All students need to make sure they clean up after themselves when they are working both in and out of lesson.  If we work together, we can keep it tidy!

 

Materials cost and availability:

15% of Art students wished for cheaper materials and more free facilities – ‘The cost of buying all of the equipment is quite high, more notice about this at the start of term or on open evenings’ and ‘More paper at the start of each term’.

Our response: We only sell materials at the price it costs us to buy and as we order from an educational supplier this is much cheaper than you would pay in the shops.  We charge for basics such as paper, brushes and glue sticks as in the past when we haven’t these things in particular have been wasted on a big enough scale to affect our budget for the year.  We supply printing materials and basic acrylic paints, however we need to charge for things such as plaster, intaglio plates and lino.  These are expensive to buy for whole classes and as we have a very small departmental budget, unfortunately we would not be able to offer these materials and techniques if we didn’t charge for them.  We think it is important, and also students think it is important, to have access to a wide range of materials and techniques.  However we will discuss how we can make the costs less prohibitive and more clear at the start of the course.

This year we have introduced a ‘Levy’ system where students can pay any amount they like up front e.g. £10 and this can be topped up whenever they like.  They can then use this to buy materials as and when they need them.  This system seems to be working extremely well for those students who use it and we highly recommend all students participate.  Although it does not reduce the cost of the materials (as we already sell them at cost price!) it does make managing the cost of them much easier for both students and the Art Department. 

As always, students from low income families may be entitled to a bursary which is accessed through student services and allocated as a fixed amount paid into their own Levy to spend as they need.

 

‘Guillotine that works (only 1 upstairs)’, ‘A paper trimmer/guillotine – I googled it £98.61 @ amazon J

Our response: I have costed replacements from our supplier and for an A2 trimmer it is £106.80, the cheapest A3 trimmer is £44.98.  We will discuss the feasibility of buying new guillotines at the next staff meeting but for now the existing ones will be checked and labelled so it is easier to keep track of which one is working and where it belongs.

We have 1 large guillotine in each room and we have ordered 4 new A3 size guillotines, 2 for upstairs and 2 for downstairs.  We have also sourced some A3 ‘mini guillotines’ suitable for cutting photos and paper which we are now selling in the technician office for £5.00.

Teaching:

2 learners wished for ‘clearer instruction’ and ‘for help with annotation.  We don’t know what to write specifically for it to be right’.

Our response: We try to be as clear as possible with our feedback and record any instructions on the NCR forms. However, if anyone is ever unclear about tasks set always ask.  We agree further help with annotation would be beneficial, expecially when time in the exam unit is short and you are still expected to show a fully ‘developed’ journey (AO1).  We are discussing ways in which we can do this without impacting too much on the practical time allocated in lessons.  I will update you when we have resolved this.

We have had much more of a focus on annotation this year within lessons and had several specific subject workshops dedicated to this.  

We have also streamlined the NCR feedback system further.  Now we check previous targets on the old sheet, carry over any incomplete targets and add new ones to a new sheet during most 121s.  This ensures all students only have 1 NCR to work from at once and previous advice/targets are always kept in mind when discussing how to develop work further.

 

‘To listen to Music in Lessons’

Our response: Unfortunately it is a college wide policy that you cannot listen to music, either on headphones or aloud in lessons.  To ensure consistency we have to abide by college rules.

This unfortunately, remains the same!

 

Fine Art Specific:

Computers in R113:

Better ‘computer access’ and ‘the upstairs computers fixing and made more efficient‘The computers in the back room of R113 to be fixed!’ was wished for by 20% of students wish was a surprise to us as we didn’t know they were used so much. 

Our response: I have emailed computer services to come and have a look at the computers to see what can be done.  I will keep you up to date of the progress.

There are now 3 working computers upstairs in the small room off R113, they have been reimaged and now work much faster.  The scanner unfortunately is not functional, however this is logged as a job to be resolved.

 

‘More Plaster available more regularly’ and ‘more 3D sculpture work, clay’

Our response: We have to collect the large bags of plaster from our supplier so this relies upon someone being available to go and fetch it.  We do try to keep as much in stock as possible however sometimes unavoidably we run out.  We have started to stock materials like clay and generally rely on ‘found’ materials for 3D e.g. wood, cardboard, anything which has been donated as these are free! If you require anything more specialised this can be ordered specifically for you from the catalogues at cost price.

We are in the same position as last year with this, 3D materials and plaster are available, we just need to order them in in plenty of time as they are expensive to keep in stock.

‘More Scissors’, ‘Scissors basket’ there [aren’t] enough scissors and there could be a place for them in classrooms’

Our response: Each classroom has a tray for basic materials which should contain 5 x pairs of scissors, rulers and any spare brushes, pencils etc that are found.  They are kept next to the paint trays in each room.  However these rely on students who borrow the materials to return them.  The technician checks these regularly, however they will be checked and fully restocked this week.

Again, we have a ‘basic materials’ tray in each classroom, however this relies upon people returning them when they have been used.

 

‘New Coat pegs’

Our response: 3 learners asked for the coat hooks in R113 to be fixed, I have emailed site staff and keep you updated.

We installed new coat hooks in R113 immediately in February last year.  After the building work they were moved to a different wall.  Unfortunately these were not put up well enough and fell off the wall! Site staff are currently looking at a more suitable way to attached these.

‘It’s always freezing in the classrooms’

Our response: Unfortunately due to the design of the rooms (specifically upstairs) the amount of windows means the rooms will always be cold in winter and warm in summer.  We have a portable heater which can be moved from room to room and have moved the plan chests away from the radiators.  We are also making enquiries with site staff.

This issue has been raised with the building managers and (we are not sure how but…..) it is much warmer upstairs!  It is however still cold in the downstairs rooms.  This issue is being looked into.

Graphic Communication Specific:

A Printer in the graphics room’, ‘Printer!’

Our response: We used to have a printer in the graphics room, however the cost and logistics of this was unworkable.  The teacher would spend most of lesson time sorting out print outs and collecting money, wasting valuable teaching time.  Also the quality of print outs was far inferior to that available at reprographics.  We do have a special deal (£5 photocopying card with 70 credits) with reprographics who have far more facilities than we could ever offer in the department e.g. printing up to A1, laminating, different papers, A3 scanning etc so we feel it would be better to continue with our current way of working.

 

A laser cutter’

Our response: We would love a laser cutter! Unfortunately the cheapest I could find was £1399.00 which is over a third of our yearly budget for the whole of the Art and Design department.  Definitely one for the wish list, but for now unfortunately it’s a no.

The response to the above two points remains the same due to cost and logistics.

‘Faster Computers’

Our response: Due to budget constraints unfortunately we have what we have. However I will check all computers and make sure they are running at a reasonable speed as well as general checks like the USB ports working etc. I will update you on the progress of this.

We had a full set of new computer base units installed throughout the department in the summer 2014.

 

‘Some trips to different galleries would be good’

Our response: We agree, getting to see ‘live’ work in the flesh is invaluable, we have organised the London trip for March and are looking into the possibility of day trips in the future, I will keep you updated!

We introduced a new AS trip this year to the Yorkshire Sculpture Park in October and are looking at different galleries to visit for the up coming London Trip.

 

As always we thank students for their in put as we value their opinions and thoughts about how our department is run.  This year, our new photography AS run and we have made many changes to the physical department and to the structure of the courses.  We are excited to hear what this year’s students think!